1. The Manufacturer’s Perspective Authors: Jimmy Roehrig Published: To be published 2. Breast Cancer Care: Changing Community Standards Authors: William M Butler, Joan E Cunningham, Douglas Bull, Tommy Cupples, Paul Guerry, James Reynolds, and C Alden Sweatman Published: Journal of Healthcare Quality 2004; Vol 26 No. 5 22-27. 3. Computer-Aided Detection in Screening Mammography: Variability in Cues Authors: Jay A. Baker, Joseph Y. Lo, David M. Delong, and Carey E. Floyd Published: Radiology 2004 – E-publication 4. Computer-Aided Detection Performance in Mammographic Examination of Masses: Assessment Authors: David Gur, Jennifer S. Stalder, Lara A. Hardesty, Bin Zheng, Jules H. Sumkin, Denise M. Chough, Betty E. Shindel, and Howard E. Rockette Published: Radiology 2004 – E-publication 5. Can Computer-Aided Detection with Double Reading of Screening Mammograms Help Decrease the False-Negative Rate? Initial Experience Authors: Destounis SV, DiNitto P, Logan-Young W, Bonaccio E, Zuley ML, and Willison KM. Published: Radiology 2004; 232:578-584. 6. Computer-Aided detection in Mammography Authors: Astley SM and Gilbert FJ. Published: Clinical Radiology 2004; 59: 390-399 (review). 7. Changes in Breast Cancer Detection and Mammography Recall Rates After the Introduction of a Computer-Aided Detection System Authors: Gur D, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE et al. Published: J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96: 185–90. 8. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography Authors: Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL, O’Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA, and Brenner RJ. Published: Radiology 2004; 230: 811-819. 9. Computer-Aided Detection Versus Independent Double Reading of Masses on Mammograms Authors: Karssemeijer N, Otten JDM, Verbeek ALM, Groenewoud JH, Koning HJ, Hendriks JHCL, and Holland R Published: Radiology 2003; 227: 192-200. 10. Analysis of 172 Subtle Findings on Prior Normal Mammograms in Women with Breast Cancer Detected at Follow-up Screening Authors: Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL, O’Shaughnessy KF, Brenner RJ, and Sickles EA Published: Radiology 2003; 226: 494-503. 11. Clinical Performance of Computer-Assisted Detection (CAD) System in Detecting Carcinoma in Breasts of Different Densities Authors: Ho WT and Lam PW. Published: Clinical Radiology 2003; 58: 133-136. 12. Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) in Screening Mammography: Sensitivity of Commercial CAD Systems for Detecting Architectural Distortion Authors: Baker JA, Rosen EL, Lo JY, Gimenez EI, Walsh R, and Soo MS. Published: AJR 2003; 181: 1083-1088. 13. Mammography with Computer-Aided Detection: Reproducibility Assessment – Initial Experience Authors: Zheng B, Hardesty LA, Poller WR, Sumkin JH, and Golla S. Published: Radiology 2003; 228: 58-62. 14. Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast: Mammographic Characteristics and Computer-Aided Detection Authors: Evans WPE, Warren Burhenne LJ, Laurie L, O'Shaughnessy KF, and Castellino RA. Published: Radiology 2002; 225: 182-189. 15. Computer-aided detection in direct digital full-field mammography: initial results Authors: Baum F, Fischer U, Obenauer S, and Grabbe E Published: Eur. Radiol 2002; 12: 3015-3017. 16. Computed-assisted detection of interval breast cancers Authors: Moberg K, Bjurstam N, Wilczek B et al. Published: European Journal of Radiology 2001; 39: 104-110. 17. A Pilot Evaluation of the R2 ImageChecker System and Users’ Response in the Detection of Interval Breast Cancers on Previous Screening Films Authors: Garvican L and Field S. Published: Clinical Radiology 2001; 56: 833-837. 18. Radiologist Detection of Microcalcifications With and Without Computer-Aided Detection: A Comparative Study Authors: Brem RF and Schoonjans JM Published: Clinical Radiology 2001; 56: 150-154. 19. Screening Mammography with Computer-Aided Detection: Prospective Study of 12,860 Patients in a Community Breast Center Authors: Freer TW and Ulissey, MJ. Published: Radiology 2001; 220:781-786. 20. Mammographic Characteristics of 115 Missed Cancers Later Detected with Screening Mammography and the Potential Utility of Computer-Aided Detection Authors: Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O’Shaughnessy KF, and Sickles EA. Published: Radiology 2001; 219: 192-202. 21. Potential Contribution of Computer-Aided Detection to the Sensitivity of Screening Mammography Authors: Burhenne LW, Wood S, D’Orsi CJ et al. Published: Radiology 2000; 215: 554-562. 22. Breast Cancer: Importance of Spiculation in Computer-Aided Detection Authors: Vyborny CJ, Doi T, O’Shaughnessy KF, Romsdahl HM, Schneider AC, and Stein AA. Published: Radiology 2000; 215: 703-707. 23. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography Authors: Castellino RA. Published: Cancer Imaging 2000; 1: 25-27. 24. The Promise of Computer Aided Detection in Digital Mammography Authors: Roehrig J and Castellino RA. Published: European Journal of Radiology 1999; 31: 35-39. 25. Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) for Mammography: Preliminary Results Authors: Nakahara H, Namba K, Fukami A et al. Published: Breast Cancer 1998; 5: 401-405. 26. Sensitivity and Specificity of Computer-Assisted Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography Screening Authors: Thurfjell E, Thurjell MG, Egge E, and Bjurstam N. Published: Acta Radiologica 1998; 39: 384-388.